Think of the following questions as you write your reflections: Thinking about writing and reflecting on W7000 purpose and resolve is a perspective conjuring the past eight weeks in the format and stylization of dissertation fashion. An island in itself; the work in W7000 has, a quality all its own. Comparing this work to other writing classes clearly defines this experience as a unique in its purpose. Intending to demonstrate the necessities of what is the formable and current standards at AUO. These are AUO’s policies, and procedures for crafting the impending requirement of the Doctoral Dissertation. The structure instruction about the means and manner of use regarding designing frame and reframing scenarios encircling concepts, which provide a useful tool to parenthetically chisel at the rocks as a stone mason toiling at a effigy, or the case of early scribe etching cuneiform; a crude information technology. Using these techniques to produce a professional communication is exciting to have finished the work and then have the tools in verified condition is meaningful and relevant to the art and science of critical writing. Breaking the structure of these elements has revealed many ideas about mapping outlines and first draft editing that willing aid in production of future communication and there is a formidable knowledge of what is expected in forth coming work. The skills of working up a written piece that fully complies too academic standards is a necessary step in focusing on the AUO procedure, which has its particular demand regarding style and format. The research work was demanding and using the library and tutorial service gave an added dimension to the course work along with citation demands specification of APA polished to some extent concepts in a presentable form. The course work is a necessary precursor to the development of dissertation work without this course the student would be clueless as to the standard policy and format preferences. This has a direct impact on the language and terminology use; which is required for placing information in a dissertation format. This is n continuing process of increasing abilities by using these tools to develop information designed to embellish the process. The art of gathering information is a process of cataloging and retrieval of material and the techniques presented in W7000 course was a great help in improving these skills. The annotation process is a mean of storing information in a coherent style addition to the bibliography as a helpful tool of using other peoples work tracking the events in a journal is providing additional information that can be accessed for use. Example: Practicability’s of student success, is in this example predicated on a preformed ideas or group think subjective sampling. Rainbow as a concept effectively connection explores refining investigative researching principles (Creswell's example of a 'Rainbow Bridge’ metaphor, and Gardner's theory regarding the multiplicities of human intelligence) reasoning behind Creswell's research. The concept entails two variables in a traditional framework: Defining theoretical characteristics: working model developed on theories dependencies Bridging temporal order: bands influencing as pay grade, authority Measurements: survey of percentages descriptive statistics Resulting from scientific observations (Creswell, 2008) provides illuminating evidence by constructing a time line as a means of ordering a systemic coherent review. As part of this effort logical orders forming a reader system. In assessing variables it’s necessary to: Become more efficient with time Order tracking Data bases This provides a method for mapping measurements in a defining meaning Creswell structures suggest methods that deal with the particular studies data variables in chronological orders similar to Aristotle categorical dispositions of nature (BCE) are similar sets standards used by researchers for finding natural properties viewed, and recording behavior to add historical perspective to the research. In the case if preparing journal and annotated bibliographies enhanced the body of information providing a substantial frame work as a base reference point. This increase the clear understanding of the material by reflecting on the journal and bibliographic work on this activity. The doctoral student may benefit from additional access to other library system and seamless access to other universities with more focus on business regarding the major work. The course could be improved by having additional instructors and grouping student into theme teams and additional seamless access to information through these libraries could provide a wider scope of information. The challenges were research and placing the contents on formation with requirement in the confines of analyzing and synthesizing material in academic processes designed to increase the students learning abilities had a positive effect on my skill set and a greater respect for plagiarism albeit the APA. References Argosy University online library resources. Retrieved from https://digitalbookshelf. Aragon, N. (2015). Personal Communications on April 12, 2015. Argosy University (2015). Article Critique Checklist. Retrieved April 26, 2015 from Argosy University Online Class: Advanced Academic Study & Writing | W7000 A01: Document Sharing Folder. American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological American Psychological Association (2015). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Creswell, John W, (213). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2013. VitalBook file. Dr. Smith, Sharon (2015). Interview Doctoral Student. AUO Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper, 3rd Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2009. VitalBook file. Fink, A. (2010). “Conducting Research Literature Reviews from the Internet to Paper, 3rd Edition.” Reviewing the Literature & Searching and Screening: Methodological quality. Nordquist, R. (2015). Academic Writing. Retrieved April 26, 2015 http://grammar.about.com/od/ab/g/academicwritingterm.htm. Pan, M. L. (2008). Preparing literature review: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak. Share your perspective about scholarly language and terminology. How will you increase your command of language and terminology suited to your discipline? Will you need to develop some structure or discipline to assist you? Describe your process for completing annotations and journal article critiques. How has your process changed? Think of the approximate amount of time you spent on each assignment. Did that improve with time? Describe, discuss, and assess your critical writing and thinking skills. Provide concrete examples as relevant. Have you noticed any change(s) since you began your doctoral program? Describe your experience in seeking, identifying, reading, analyzing, and synthesizing the various academic resources and journal articles. What worked well and what were the challenges? What have you learned about writing a literature review that will help you in writing future papers? What did you find useful about this course and what recommendations do you have for making the course more meaningful and relevant for doctoral students? Submit your reflections to the Discussion Area by Tuesday, April 28, 2015. Review and comment on the work of others through the end of Module 8.